Creation of Reality through Conscious Observation By Mohsen Paul Sarfarazi, Ph.D.

Abstract

The phenomenon of conscious creation of our realities has been discussed with particular reference to three fundamental quantum mechanics theories known as the Schrodinger Cat Experiment [and its interpretation attributed to Copenhagen], the Many Worlds Theory, and the Young’s so-called Double- Slit Experiment. It is elucidated that contrary to our common belief that the macroscopic world pre-exists and has a set reality, as far as the position in time and space is concerned, the quantum mechanics asserts that the position of a particle at the quantum state cannot be determined unless a “measurement” of its position is made. More, specifically the position of a particle in space is defined as a quantum wave function that predicts the probability of a position and not it’s certain location. Furthermore, it is clarified that, in reality, the fundamental constituents of matter, the electrons, protons, etc. can have two distinct states of existence: particle and wave form. While the particulate representation of the constituents of matter within the classical macroscopic theory gives the impression of ‘existing’ at a particular point in space and time, the wave representation asserts an uncertainty of location (known as “superposition’’) at any point in the continuum of time and space, until the entity is ‘observed.’ In this regard, it ascertains that the act of observation affects the position and the energy of a particle. Therefore, an observer is the most important part of a quantum experiment. And, no observation or ‘measurement’ can be conducted without sentient consciousness. Thus, it is, ultimately, the consciousness that creates the reality behind positioning of any entity in a continuum of time and space. Simply put, quantities only become actual when they are observed consciously. Particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.) as well as we, pop in and out of existence constantly. And, the destinations are what we refer to as the ‘parallel dimensions.’ In conclusion, the author strongly agrees with the Physicist David Deutsch’s argument in his book The Fabric of Reality that the double-slit experiment is evidence for the many-worlds interpretation, thus testifying to the author’s assessment that consciousness is a discrete, quantum, and multidimensional phenomenon [1].   

Introduction

• Although it is very hard to fully comprehend, and indeed, ‘believe’ within our present pre-conditioned paradigm of reality, it is the sentient frequency of consciousness that actually forms and reforms everything including the constituent particles of matter in physicality into the geometric patterns that we perceive as being pre-existing in the Multiuniverse.
• Our universe is comprised of only 3.37% matter.
• The rest are antimatter and stealth to our physical senses.
• It may be hard for us to readily digest this as we have been made to believe otherwise for at least 13 millennia, but as divine sentient conscious beings we are creators.
• Through the omnipotent power of collective consciousness we have created everything to be as they are.
• This is not an illusion, it is not a fantasy but ‘true’ that we have all created everything the universe to be shaped as they are.
• Without sentient consciousness nothing exists as they appear they do.
• They only exist as probabilities.
• There are several experiments in quantum mechanics and physics that can, indeed, prove this fact to us up close and without a shadow of a doubt.

Classical Macroscopic Observation of the Effect of Sound Frequencies on Particles

• The simplest way to demonstrate this in classical physics is to simply scatter loose particles of matter such as fine grains of sand on an experiment table.
  
• Initially, it is seen that that the particles of matter [sand] are in chaotic status and there is no shape or pattern to them.
• However, once the system is subject to resonant frequencies of sound, it becomes apparent that the sand particles rearrange themselves into discernible patterns that become progressively more complex as the frequency of the imparting sound is increased.
• First, one sees simple patterns emerge as the particles of sand rearrange themselves into distinct patterns that change from chaotic amorphous and highly heterogeneous state into a more ordered pattern that begin to give the impression of a certain shape or pattern.
• And, as the frequency of sound is increased, finer and more detailed patters emerge, and suddenly one can distinguish or identify the newly emerged pattern of arrangement of the particulate mass of the sand on the table.
• And, this is a simple illustration for how our conscious mind creates things right out of the blue.
• There is a well-definable frequency associated with consciousness that is not unlike the frequency of sound.

Effect of Sentient Consciousness as an ‘Observer’

• As a conscious presence appears within a continuum of time and space the particles of matter begin to rearrange forming into shapes and things as our sub-conscious or superconscious mind demands them to be.
• Everything that we perceive to exist in our reality only exit as they appear because of our consciousness.
• And, without the presence of such consciousness all the particles of matter behave as waves of probabilities and not as we envision them to be.
• Our perception of everything existing is based upon frequencies.
• Any ophthalmologist will tell you that we do not actually see anything to exist as we perceive they do.
• It is all just that, simply ‘perception.’
• The frequency of an object as we perceive to exist first reaches the cells of our retina.
• There, due to the existing of what is known as cones in the outer portion of our retina cells, the incoming particles of light become accelerated as to facilitate the process of ‘seeing.’
• Then, the brain translates the received frequencies into a pictorial interpretation that it is pre-programmed to do so based upon belief, and projects this image to the back of the brain that effectively acts as a giant TV screen.
• And, then we think we are ‘seeing’ the object.
• The details of the perceived object is highly dependent on the extent of our focused attention on the ‘object.’
• The more we deliberate by focusing our attention on the object, and the more we ponder, the more ‘pixels’ in the form of frequencies we receive, and as a result, we project a more detailed picture at the back of our brain that, in effect, becomes more and more ‘high definition.’
• As a result, we see more details such as delicate pattern of the ‘object’ or colors, or more clarity of the overall image we create in the back of our brain.
• And, it is all done through consciousness and state of mind that manifests itself as perception.
• Strictly speaking, things do not exist as they appear if we are not focusing our attention on their existence.
• This is why there is often as diverse are the particulars of an event happening as when witnessed by a myriad of observers.
• In essence, they are all correct, and there is no false or erroneous account of what is being witnessed providing there is an honest intent behind the myriad of diverse narrations of the event being witnessed.
• It is all done through the particular perception of the witness.
• And, if an observer is biased in his/her opinion regarding the event that has transpired, possibly due to certain historical background, he/she will actually ‘see’ things differently.
• And, it may all be innocent and not pre-mediated.
• The exact details and sequence of an event that is transpiring is completely geared to the belief system of the observer.
• Although one might resort to possible accuracy based upon shear number of observers who may ‘see’ the event having taken place a certain way, this too is subject to the state of collective consciousness of such observers.
• For example, if a certain event has had a certain history of occurrence in the past, then simply that becomes the status quo or the state of affair being perceived as the correct or the precise one.

Fundamentals of Quantum Physics

• Quantum Physics is also known as Quantum Mechanics or Quantum Field Theory.
• Quantum Physics deals with physics at the atomic and subatomic levels at a scale, which is typified by the Planck number.
• Normal physics cannot explain the quantum phenomena.
• Quantum physics is a science of probabilities rather than exactness as put forward by Plato or as is commonly understood in Newtonian Mechanics.
• An electron is not really matter as we know it. It is a cloud of energy.
• Electrons, protons, neutrons pop ‘in’ and ‘out’ of existence constantly.
• Scientists don’t know why, and indeed where they go; they just know that they do.
• The author asserts that they interface with the ‘parallel’ domains of reality or dimensional consciousness that ‘incoherently’ function independent from one another.

Quantum Wave Function:

• Quantum existence is tied to the environment, opposite to the independence of macroscopic objects.
• The wave function is the mathematical tool for analyzing quantum entities.
• Wave functions express likelihood of ‘existing’ of something, until a ‘measurement’ is made.

     The Role of an Observer:

• Observer is an important part of any quantum experiment.
• Quantum objects and quantities becomes actual only when observed.
• One cannot isolate the observer and its effect on a quantum experiment.
• The act of observing affects the position and the energy of a particle.
• The subatomic material will take the form of a wave when it is not observed.
• Until we observe an entity that is soon to materialize, say as a particle, etc., it is a ‘wave’ of probabilities.
• However, when observed, the particle ‘collapses’ to one point as a particle.
• Since the location of a subatomic particle is not defined until it is observed (such as striking a screen), a photon or an electron cannot be associated with having location.
• In fact, there is a strong relation between the properties of a quantum object and the act of measuring those properties.
• Since the quantum world cannot be observed directly, we are forced to use instruments as extensions of our senses.
• The wave function addresses the position of a particle as a likelihood or probability until a measurement is made.
• When a position measurement is made the wave function is said to have ‘collapsed’ [i.e. the wave nature of the electron converted to a particle nature].
• The fact that quantum systems, such as electrons and protons, have indeterminate aspects means they exist as possibilities rather than actualities.
• This gives them the property of being things that might be or might happen, rather than things that they are.
• This is in sharp contrast to Newtonian physics where things either are, or are not, and there is no uncertainty associated with them except those that may have been created through limitations of the data gathering equipment.
• Further experimentation has shown that reality at the quantum (microscopic) level consists of two kinds of reality, actual and potential.
• The ‘actual’ is what we get when we see or measure a quantum entity, the ‘potential’ is the state the object was before it was ‘measured.’
• A quantum entity (a photon, electron, neutron, etc.) exists in multiple possibilities of realities known as superpositions.

     Superposition:

• The key proof for quantum superpositions is the phenomenon of quantum tunneling.
• The position of the electron, the wave function, is truly not uncertain.
• Observation causes the wave function to collapse to an actual state.
• A quantum entity has a dual potential nature, but its actual [observed] nature is one or the other.
• The wave nature of the microscopic world makes the concept of ‘position’ vague for subatomic particles.
• An electron in orbit has no position to speak of, other than it is somewhere in its orbit.
• Quantum physics utilizes a quantum wave function for mathematical description of the superpositions associated with a quantum entity at any particular moment.
• The superposition of possible positions for an electron can be demonstrated by the observed phenomenon called quantum tunneling.
• Notice that the only explanation for quantum tunneling is if the position of the electron is truly spread out, not just hidden or unmeasured, its uncertainty allows for the wave function to penetrate the barrier.
• It is not deterministic and not unknown until someone ‘measures’ it.
• It is important to note that the superposition of possibilities only occurs before the entity is observed.
• Once an observation is made [position, mass, velocity is measured], then the superposition converts to an actual.
• Or, in quantum language, we say the wave function has ‘collapsed.’
• Quantum existence is tied to the environment, opposite to the independence of macroscopic objects.
• The collapse of the wave function by observation is a transition from the many probabilities to the one, from probability to actuality.
• In the macroscopic world ruled by classical physics, things are what they appear to be.
• In the quantum world, there is relation among the particle, its surroundings, and a person who is studying it through measurement observation.

The Schrodinger’s Cat [Thought] Experiment

• In order to illustrate the fact that it is sentient consciousness that creates all that seem to exist, consider the case of double slit experiment in quantum mechanics:
• Consider the well-known problem in quantum mechanics commonly referred to as the 1935 Schrodinger’s Cat [Thought] experiment: a cat, a container of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box.
• When an internal sensor such as a Geiger counter detects radioactivity, implying atomic decay, the container has been shattered, releasing the poison that kills the cat.
• Before the box is opened, the quantum theory interpretation [attributed to Copenhagen] implies that the cat is simultaneously alive and dead.
• Yet, when one looks inside the box, one can only see one outcome, i.e., the cat is either alive or dead, and not both.
• This poses a dilemma or a paradox in terms of the quantum mechanics interpretation [known as the ‘quantum superposition’].
• The question arises as to when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality collapses into one possibility or the other.
• The experiment, more specifically, addresses the proposal that a quantum system such as an atom or photon can exist as a combination of multiple states corresponding to different possible outcomes.
• This is to say that a quantum system remains in this state of ‘superposition’ until it is interacted with, or observed by, the external world, at which time the superposition collapses into one or the other possible definite outcome.
• The “alive and dead” cat superposition of Schrodinger’s Cat [Thought] experiment, is in fact, quite real depending on the point of view or perspective that it is looked upon.
• If one leaves this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no radioactive atom ever decayed.
• A macroscopic indeterminacy [whether cat is dead or alive] arises from this situation constrained by the indeterminacy originally indigenous to the to the quantum domain, which may be resolved through direct observation regarding the decaying of the radioactive atoms within the box.
• This represents an ‘indistinct model’ for us regarding the discernment of the macroscopic reality at hand, rendering it unclear or contradictory.
• Just when exactly does the quantum system stop existing as a superposition of states [cat being dead or alive] and become one or the other?
• More clearly, when does the actual ‘quantum’ state stop, and instead, a unique ‘classical’ outcome emerges?
• Clearly, a system stops being a superposition of states and becomes either one or the other when an observation takes place, i.e., a conscious observation.
• The most commonly held interpretation of quantum mechanics is the Copenhagen interpretation, which states that a system stops being a superposition of states and becomes either one or the other when a ‘measurement’ takes place.
• The experiment interprets that while the box is closed, the system simultaneously exists in a superposition of the states “decayed nucleus/dead cat” and “un-decayed nucleus/living cat”.
• Only when the box is opened and a measurement is made, the wave function collapses into one of the two states.
• The cat would be either dead or alive long before the box is opened by an observer.
• The measure of radioactivity by such an instrument such as a Geiger counter would be able to determine whether the quantum wave function is collapsed before there is any measurement of the event.
• This is the reason that quantum mechanics leaves the relevancy of a ‘conscious’ observation and states everything in terms of ‘measurement’ rather than consciousness.
• However, it is quite clear that the interpretation of the results recorded by a Geiger counter, indeed, requires consciousness.
• This is why the author interprets Schrodinger’s Cat [Thought] experiment via a new interpretation that stresses that it is conscious observation that is the key fundamental principle that reduces the problem of superposition of quantum mechanics into a classical certainty, namely that either the cat is dead or alive [and not both].
• In the Schrodinger cat experiment, when opening the box, an observer becomes ‘entangled’ with the state of the cat being observed.
• Two “observer states” are formed, one corresponding to the cat’s being alive and the other the cat being dead.
• Each ‘observer state’ is entangled or linked with the cat so that the “observation of the cat’s state” and the “cat’s state” correspond with each other.
• Quantum incoherence ensures that the different outcomes have no interaction with each other.
• The same mechanism of quantum incoherence is also important for the interpretation in terms of consistent histories.
• Only the “dead cat” or the “alive cat” can be a part of a consistent history in this interpretation and not both.
• This is why it is such that the past is never set in the stone.
• One can enter through the focal point in the center of the ‘clock’ or ‘wheel of consciousness’ as described in companion papers, and change the details of one’s past history from a particular point in space and time and create a new Akashic Record thereafter.
• Generally, there is nothing in the formalism of the discrete and incoherent quantum mechanics of consciousness that demands that a state of consciousness cannot involve the simultaneous perception of a live and a dead cat.
• The only catch is that two continuums of space and time exist as parallels regarding the live and dead state of the cat in the box, triggered by the two mutually independent incoherent states of consciousness of a single [or two] observers.

The Many Worlds Theory [Parallel Dimensions] and the Discrete Consciousness Theory

• On the other hand, the many worlds approach of quantum mechanics denies that collapse ever occurs in the Schrodinger Cat Experiment.
• According to the many-worlds interpretation, the cat is both alive and dead, regardless of whether the box is opened or not.
• The “alive” and “dead” cats are in different branches of the universe that are equally real but cannot interact with each other.
• In the many-worlds interpretation, both alive and dead states of the cat persist after the box is opened, but are incoherent [or “decoherent” in the language of quantum mechanics] from each other.
• When the box is opened, the observer splits into one that is looking at a box with a dead cat, and an observer looking at a box with a live cat.
• Since the dead and alive states are incoherent, there is no effective communication or interaction between them.
• This approach resolves the grandfather paradox often stated related traveling back in time.
• The grandfather paradox brings up the dilemma that if one goes back in time and kill his/her own grandfather, then he/she cannot feasibly exist.
• However, if one looks at a set of two different probabilities each pertaining to a distinct parallel of time and space, the ambiguity of the grandfather paradox never materializes as there are two distinct grandfathers that are incoherent with one another.
• If the person travels to a parallel that represent the ‘past,’ he/she will encounter a different grandfather that would exist in its own past.
• Since the two are not inter-related and incoherent with one another, killing this grandfather dos not necessarily create a paradox.
• Such is the nature of our multiple lifetimes in different parallels of time and space.
• Generally speaking, the different aspects of the parent soul experience life sojourns in similar continuum of space, but they are totally independent and incoherent from one another.
• It may be that one parallel portrays the past or future of the other, but they occur independently and dis-jointly from one another.
  
• The distinction between the ‘Copenhagen interpretation [cat being either dead or alive and not both]’ and ‘the many-worlds theory’ becomes clear and geared to the discrete nature of our flashing consciousness as separate ‘soul aspects’ or observers resonating incoherently in distinct continuums of time and space within different parallel dimensions.
  
• In this regard, the Schrodinger’s cat experimentation is not a paradox whatsoever, and serves to discard the idea that a single physical system in quantum consciousness mechanics has a single mathematical outcome or solution.
• The nature of quantum consciousness asserts that all systems that may be considered as “observers” are not governed by the same wave function evolution.
• Indeed, it is rational by standards of expanded consciousness to say that different observers can give distinct accounts of the same series of events depending upon their resonant frequency or wave function of their evolution.
• One may also look upon the problem of the Schrodinger cat experiment from the point of view of the objective collapse theories, which states that the ambiguity that whether the cat is dead or alive disappears irrespective of external observation, when some objective physical threshold [of time, mass, etc.] is reached.
• Thus, the cat would be expected to have settled into a definite state of either being dead or alive long before the box is opened.
• Objective collapse theories require a modification of standard quantum mechanics theories to allow for the process of time evolution.
• And, time evolution is the single primary impetus that creates coherency between two distinct states of frequency, wave functions or consciousness.
• And, this is, indeed, what is the primary concern of mankind nowadays in this age of pre-ascension.
• The crux of the matter is to strive for expanded consciousness so a coherent state is achieved among all soul aspects so that multidimensionality becomes clearly discernible in the NOW moment.
• This means one becomes conscious of all the paradigm of realities in myriads of continuums of time and space within all the parallels.
• When man’s frequency [or light quotient] of consciousness reaches certain threshold value, equal to its largest magnitude among all possible values that man resonates with, it is possible to become multidimensional in the NOW, being capable to see through all veils of separations among all participatory parallel dimensions.

The Double-Slit Experiment

• Another experiment that is pertinent to the subject of consciousness is the double-slit experiment performed by Thomas Young in 1801, which is sometimes referred to as Young’s experiment.
• This experiment demonstrates that light as well as matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles.
• It displays the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.
• The experiment illustrates the validity of a “double path” phenomenon, in which a wave is split into two separate waves that later combine into a single wave.
• Changes in the path lengths of both waves result in a phase shift, creating an interference pattern.
• A coherent light source such as a laser beam illuminates a plate perforated by two parallel slits, and the light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate.
• The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere, producing bright and dark bands on the screen, a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles.
• However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles [not waves].
• An interference pattern appears due to the varying density of these particle hitting the screen.
  
• If detectors are placed at the slits, it is found that each photon passes through one slit [as would a classical particle], and not through both slits [as would a wave].
• These results demonstrate the ‘principle of wave–particle duality’ in quantum mechanics.
  
• Other atomic-scale entities such as electrons are found to exhibit the same behavior when fired toward a double slit, in which again the detection of individual discrete impacts is observed to be inherently probabilistic, which is inexplicable using classical mechanics.
• The experiment can be done even with entities much larger than electrons and photons, although it becomes more difficult as size increases.
• If a “single-slit experiment” is performed, the pattern on the screen is a diffraction pattern in which the light is spread out, in which the smaller the slit, the greater the angle of spread.
• Diffraction indicates that the pattern obtained is the result of the interference of light waves from the slit.
• If two parallel slits with a more intense red laser are illuminated, the light from the two slits again interferes.
• However, the interference is a more pronounced pattern with a series of light and dark bands.
• The width of the bands is a property of the frequency of the illuminating light.
• Thomas Young (1773–1829) first demonstrated the double slit experiment and the ensuing phenomenon of wave interference.
• This experiment became the basis for belief that light consists of waves, as the distribution of brightness can be explained by the alternately additive and subtractive interference of wavefronts.
• Young’s experiment, performed in the early 1800’s, played a vital part in the acceptance of the wave theory of light, vanquishing the earlier theory of light proposed by Isaac Newton, which had been the accepted model of light propagation in the 17th and 18th centuries.
• However, the later discovery of the photoelectric effect demonstrated that under different circumstances, light can behave as if it is composed of discrete particles.
• These seemingly contradictory discoveries made it necessary to go beyond classical physics and take the quantum nature of light into account.
• The double-slit experiment has become a classic thought experiment, for its clarity in expressing the central puzzles of quantum mechanics.
• It demonstrates the fundamental limitation to predict the experimental results.
• It is a phenomenon that is impossible to explain in any classical way, and one that is indigenous to quantum mechanics, explaining its mystery.
• Indeed, “all of quantum mechanics can be gleaned from carefully thinking through the implications of this single experiment [Richard Feynman].”
• As a thought experiment, Feynman also proposed that if detectors were placed before each slit, the interference pattern would disappear.
• The detailed treatment of the duality relation of the mathematics of the double-slit interference was furnished in the context of quantum mechanics by Englert–Greenberger.
• A double-slit experiment was not performed with anything other than light until 1961, and in 1974, the experiment was repeated using single electrons, showing that each electron interferes with itself as predicted by the quantum theory.
• Sending particles through a double-slit apparatus one at a time results in single particles appearing on the screen, as expected.
• Remarkably, however, an interference pattern emerges when these particles are allowed to build up one by one.
• This demonstrates the wave-particle duality, which states that all matter exhibits both wave and particle properties.
• The particle is measured as a single pulse at a single position, while the wave describes the probability of absorbing the particle at a specific place of the detector.
• This phenomenon has been shown to occur with photons, electrons, atoms and even some molecules.
• So experiments with electrons testifies to the fact that electrons, protons, neutrons, and even larger entities, which are ordinarily called particles, nevertheless have their own wave nature and even their own specific frequencies.
• In a 1972 double-slit system, where only one slit was left open at any time, interference was nonetheless observed provided the path difference was such that the detected photon could have come from either slit.
• The experimental conditions were such that the photon density in the system was much less than unity.
• Much of the behavior of light can be modeled using classical wave theory.
• The Huygens–Fresnel principle is one such model; it states that each point on a wavefront generates a secondary spherical wavelet.
• This says that a particle or a wave can interfere with itself.
• The disturbance at any subsequent point can be found by summing the contributions of the individual wavelets at that point.
• This summation needs to take into account the phase as well as the amplitude of the individual wavelets.
• In the double-slit experiment, the two slits are illuminated by a single laser beam.
• If the width of the slits is small enough (less than the wavelength of the laser light), the slits diffract the light into cylindrical waves.
• These two cylindrical wavefronts are then superimposed together.
• One of the mathematical constructs that enables experimenters to predict very accurately certain experimental results is sometimes called a probability wave.
• One cannot speak of the location of any particle such as a photon between the time it is emitted and the time it is detected simply because in order to say that something is located somewhere at a certain time one has to detect it.
• The requirement for the eventual appearance of an interference pattern is that particles be emitted, and that there be a screen with at least two distinct paths for the particle to take from the emitter to the detection screen.
• The author agrees with the Physicist David Deutsch argument in his book The Fabric of Reality that the double-slit experiment is evidence for the many-worlds interpretation.
• The Double Slit Experiment shows us that we create reality just by observing it.
• The two slit experiment is key to understanding the microscopic world
• Waves can interfere.
• For light, this will make a series of light and dark bands.
• Matter particles, such as electrons, also produce interference patterns due to their wave-like nature.
• So with a high flux of either photons or electrons, the characteristic interference pattern is visible.
• if we lower the intensity of light, or the flux of electrons (the electric current), we should be able to see each photon strike the screen.
• Each photon makes a dot on the screen.
• The interference pattern is still there, it simply takes some time for enough photons, or electrons, to strike the screen to build up a recognizable pattern.
• Interference, or a wave phenomenon, is still occurring even if we only let the photons, or electrons, through one at a time.
• The individual particles apparently interfering with themselves.
• In order for a particle to interfere with itself, it must pass through both slits.
• The two slit experiment is a good test of the role of the observer in the quantum realm.
• Any experimental design that attempts to determine which slit a photon has passed through (test for its particle nature) destroys the interference pattern (its wavelike nature).
• This is a breakdown of objective reality.
• Each quantum entity has dual potential properties, which become an actual characteristic if and when it is observed.
• In order to explain the double slits experiment, we first must truly grasp the difference between a particle and a wave.
• A particle is what we perceive as matter of some sort – something with mass.
• A wave is a disturbance in some type of substance – like ripples through water.
• A subatomic particle isn’t a particle until you observe it. It’s a wave.
• For some unknown reason that haunts scientists, everything we perceive as having mass is just a wave of information (or possibilities) until we observe it in some way.
• The Double Slit Experiment seems to answer the question.
• It truly reveals a mind-altering view of the world and how we affect it.
• We do create reality!
• We all have powers that we are not aware of.
• We create reality by observing things.

References:

1. https://quantummicromechanics.wordpress.com/2015/06/19/mechanics-of-discrete-quantum-multidimensional-consciousness-by-mohsen-paul-sarfarazi-ph-d/

Institute of Spiritual Science Inc. Publishing 2014.

All Rights Reserved.

No part of this article may be fragmented or copied without a written approval by the author.

This article may be shared or posted on websites, Facebook pages or any public forum only in its entirety, and only if it is offered free of charge to the public without any page charges, download fees, or membership charges.